|
Chapter 30: Quantum Physics Applications |
![]() |

STM image of the surface of a silicon crystal, courtesy of Dr. B. Swartzentruber, Sandia National Labs
This article will describe this breakthrough that has at last allowed us to "see" atoms. I have kept the term "see" in quotes, because the microscope in question does not operate by bouncing light off a sample and creating a magnified image. Rather, the STM operates by taking advantage of quantum tunneling to measure the shape of the electron "cloud" at the surface of a material. That is, it makes a contour map of the surface, where the contours follow lines of constant electron density. Some people will argue that this is not really "seeing", but there can be little doubt that the peaks and valleys on many STM images represent individual atoms and the spaces between them.
How does this amazing device work? The key is in quantum
tunneling. Tunneling is an essential feature of quantum
mechanics, that we can understand in terms of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. In one
form, the uncertainty principle says
Here is
an analogy. A marble is placed in a cereal bowl and given
enough of a push to roll half way up the side. If there is
little friction, the ball can roll back and forth for a while,
but it will never have enough energy to roll all the way up and
over the wall. It cannot overcome the barrier. However, for a
subatomic particle, the situation is very different. The
particle's energy is tiny, and so are the barriers it faces.
There is a reasonable chance that a subatomic particle can pass
over a barrier and escape. Once it is out, it doesn't need the
energy anymore.
This is
how the scanning tunneling microscope works. In the STM, a very
sharp metal tip (usually tungsten) is held near the surface of
a conducting sample. A small voltage (usually 1.5 to 3 V) is
placed between the tip and the sample. Now, the electrons in
the tip would like to flow to the sample. If the tip touches
the sample current will flow easily, if the tip is far away,
the electrons cannot overcome the barrier and "jump" the gap.
However, if the distance is just right, the electrons can
tunnel out of the tip and get into the sample. This process is
illustrated in the diagrams.
What
makes this process truly wonderful (besides the fact that it
can happen at all) is the tunneling current depends very
sensitively on the size of the gap. If we move the tip
laterally over the sample, the current changes strongly in
response to variations in the surface height. This is known as
constant height mode. What is actually even better is constant
current mode. In this operation, the tip is moved laterally,
and as it moves its height is adjusted in order to keep the
tunneling current constant. As this process occurs, the height
adjustments are recorded. The tip literally follows the
contours of the sample.
It would be a shame to leave you with the impression that
STM is a scientific curiosity with no purpose beyond making
pretty pictures. On the contrary, STM is a powerful tool for
learning new and useful information about the physics and
chemistry of surfaces. One example is in the understanding of
how films of materials grow. Many important technologies
(semiconductors
and magnetic storage come to mind) depend on devices
that are made of thin films of material (silicon and magnetic
alloys in those two examples). The precision of the devices
depends crucially on the precision with which the films can be
grown. STM has helped to solve many problems in our
understanding of film growth.
The figure to the left shows an example (courtesy of Dr. J. Stroscio of the National Institute for Standards and Technology). In these images we do not see the individual atoms laterally, but we do see single atom changes in height. The brightness represents the height of the surface, brighter areas are higher than dark. Thus, the film on the left (a) has grown as many small islands, and there are at least three separate layers showing. On the other hand, the film on the right (b) is growing in a "layer-by-layer" mode. This is desirable because the resulting film will be flatter and have fewer defects. Furthermore, if it is necessary to grow another film on top, the next film will have a better surface to start from, and there may be less intermixing. What allowed the improvement? The only difference was the temperature during film growth. Film (a) was grown at 488 K, whereas film (b)t was grown at 573 K. Films grown at lower temperatures are even worse than (a), and growth above 573 K causes other problems. Thus, an optimum temperature was obtained, along with a clear understanding of the reason.
For more information ...
1.
2.
3.
4. 
From the manufacturers of STM's...
5.
6.
7.

And those guys at IBM really go all out...
8 
Research questions:
|
© 2000-2002 by Prentice-Hall, Inc. A Pearson Company Distance Learning at Prentice Hall Legal Notice |