Chapter 15: Macroeconomic Issues and Policy
Multiple Choice


1.  

The effects of the stock market on the economy can be described as follows:

Higher stock prices increase household wealth and consumption only in the future; therefore, current consumption remains the same, and current output, income, and aggregate spending are not affected.
Higher stock prices decrease household wealth, causing a decrease in current and future consumption, a decrease in output and income, and lower aggregate spending today.
Higher stock prices increase household wealth, causing an increase in current and future consumption, an increase in output and income, and higher aggregate spending today.
Stock prices are not a determinant of household wealth; thus, changes in stock prices do not affect consumption, output, income, or aggregate spending.
Changes in the stock market affect the monetary side of the economy but not the real economy.


2.  

If household wealth decreases by one dollar, the corresponding decrease in consumption in the subsequent year is estimated to be:

About 2 cents.
About 4 cents.
About 10 cents.
About 75 cents.
About the same, one dollar.


3.  

The decrease in consumption as a result of a decrease in stock prices is:

Slower and smoother than the corresponding decrease in wealth.
Faster and more volatile than the corresponding decrease in wealth.
Gradual but highly volatile.
Unpredictable.
Nonexistent. Stock prices do not affect consumption.


4.  

What was the impact of the stock market crash of 1987?

The stock market crash sent the economy almost immediately into a recession.
The Fed adopted tight monetary policy, which aggravated the situation.
There was a negative wealth effect, but not as large as it could have been if the decrease in wealth had been considered more permanent.
The crash had a significant effect on consumption.
All of the above.


5.  

If the wealth multiplier is 1.4, and households spend 5 cents of each additional dollar increase in wealth, how much is the impact on spending of an increase in stock prices that adds $3 trillion to household wealth?

$21 million.
$3 trillion.
$28 billion.
$210 billion.
$28 trillion.


6.  

Which of the following statements is entirely correct?

The Fed is likely to increase the money supply during times of high output and low inflation.
The Fed is likely to increase the money supply during times of low output and low inflation.
The Fed is likely to decrease the money supply during times of high output and low inflation.
The Fed's behavior "goes with the wind;" that is, when the economy expands, the Fed expands the money supply, and when the economy contracts, the Fed contracts the money supply.


7.  

Refer to the graph below. Suppose the economy is at point d. At this point, the Fed is more likely to:

26a.gif

Expand the money supply.
Contract the money supply.
Increase government spending.
Decrease government spending.


8.  

During which of the following time periods did the Fed adopt contractionary monetary policy?

During the 1990-1991 recession.
After the 1990-1991 recession, in 1992 and 1993.
At the end of 1993.
At the end of 1998.
All of the above.


9.  

The time it takes for the economy to adjust to the new conditions after a new policy is implemented is known as:

The recognition lag.
The implementation lag.
The response lag.
The stabilization policy lag.
The "fool in the shower."


10.  

Which of the following changes in fiscal policy has a shorter response lag than the others?

An increase in government spending.
A cut in personal taxes.
A cut in business taxes.
All of the above measures have about the same response lag.


11.  

The relationship between fiscal policy, monetary policy, and response lags is as follows:

The response lags for fiscal policy are longer than the response lags for monetary policy.
Monetary policy can be adjusted more quickly than fiscal policy, but the response to monetary changes is slower than the response to changes in fiscal policy.
Extra government spending stimulates extra private spending almost instantaneously.
Monetary and fiscal policy changes have almost identical response lags.


12.  

Which of the following pieces of proposed legislation called for automatic spending cuts whenever a budget deficit was larger than the targeted amount?

The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993.
The Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Bill of 1986, referred to as GRH.
The balanced-budget amendment of 1995.
All of the legislation pieces above required automatic spending cuts whenever a budget deficit was larger than the targeted amount.


13.  

Which of the following statements is true?

The government budget deficit tends to rise when GDP rises, and tends to fall when GDP falls.
The government budget deficit tends to rise when GDP falls, and tends to fall when GDP rises.
There is no consistent relationship between the government budget deficit and the level of GDP.
An increase in government spending shifts the AD curve to the left and results in a decrease in output and a contraction in the economy; thus, revenue from personal and corporate income taxes will fall.
A decrease in government spending lowers GDP by about the same amount of the decrease.


14.  

The relationship between government spending and the government's budget deficit is as follows:

A decrease in government spending causes an increase in GDP and a decrease in the budget deficit.
A decrease in government spending causes a decrease in GDP, and the decrease in GDP causes an increase in the budget deficit.
In order to reduce the deficit, any decrease in government spending must be less than the targeted decrease in the deficit.
Increasing or decreasing government spending does not have any impact on the government's budget deficit.


15.  

Suppose that the multiplier of government spending is 1.5 and the deficit response index (DRI) equals - .20. What is the impact of a $20 billion reduction in government spending on the budget deficit?

$4 billion reduction in the budget deficit.
$3 billion reduction in the budget deficit.
$9 billion reduction in the budget deficit.
$6 billion reduction in the budget deficit.
$4.5 billion reduction in the budget deficit.


16.  

Suppose that the economy goes into a recession after the government had targeted the deficit; that is, the government had set the size of the deficit in advance. Then,

Contraction in the economy will be larger than it would have been without deficit targeting.
Contraction in the economy will be smaller than it would have been without deficit targeting.
Contraction in the economy will be automatically eliminated.
Contraction in the economy would be impossible.


17.  

Trends in the economies of European countries include the following:

The inflation rate has been generally falling over time.
A fairly high level of unemployment across most of Europe has prevailed since 1980.
Union power has kept the real wage rate too high to allow full employment to be achieved.
Monetary and fiscal policies have not been expansionary enough.
All of the above.


© 2000-2001 by Prentice-Hall, Inc.
A Pearson Company
Distance Learning at Prentice Hall
Legal Notice